For the field research of the research project, five data collection instruments were built:
Q1) Institutional and sectorial cataloging/mapping
Q2) Management's perceptions of university pedagogical advisory
Q3) Perceptions of University Pedagogical Advisory
Q4) Narratives about the university pedagogical advisory service - participating professors
Q5) Narratives about the university pedagogical advisory service - non-participating professors
The instruments were applied in the partner institutions of the research project, so that the collected data were analyzed in the light of categories defined a priori:
A) Conception of advisory:
- How do you conceive the advisory work?
- What practices do they entail?
- How do they structure them?
- What beliefs are present?
B) Advisor profile:
- Who are they?
- How did they get there?
- What kind of training do you have for this?
C) Institutional teaching training policy:
- What history does it reflect?
- What culture does it reflect?
D) Legitimacy of the advisory practice:
- What motivates participation?
- What demobilizes participation?
- What appreciation does it have?
- What recognition does it have?
Project 1 (2022 - 2023)
The results of the research related to the fieldwork that evidenced the experiences of pedagogical advisory in the partner institutions are compiled in the International Pedagogical Advisory Dossier: experiences in an international context. Dossier
In addition to this production, the final analysis of the research from Project Edition 1 was published in the journal Integración & Conocimiento.
